<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2006 Koenigsegg CCX</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.hishamrana.com/2006/02/22/2006-koenigsegg-ccx/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.hishamrana.com/2006/02/22/2006-koenigsegg-ccx</link>
	<description>chaos is the score upon which reality is written</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 19:15:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Naylor</title>
		<link>http://blog.hishamrana.com/2006/02/22/2006-koenigsegg-ccx/comment-page-1#comment-225</link>
		<dc:creator>David Naylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2006 22:06:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.hishamrana.com/2006/02/22/2006-koenigsegg-ccx/#comment-225</guid>
		<description>Well, I&#039;m not sure how they are nowadays, reliability-wise. But surely they have improved compared to the CC8S? Who knows.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I&#8217;m not sure how they are nowadays, reliability-wise. But surely they have improved compared to the CC8S? Who knows.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hisham</title>
		<link>http://blog.hishamrana.com/2006/02/22/2006-koenigsegg-ccx/comment-page-1#comment-224</link>
		<dc:creator>Hisham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2006 21:51:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.hishamrana.com/2006/02/22/2006-koenigsegg-ccx/#comment-224</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the heads up. You have some great posts about the car at your blog. The 900 horsepower number sounds like it could be enough to push the car over the Bugatti record. My only concern is that Koenigseggs aren&#039;t really hallmarks of reliability and I wonder what the latest changes do to address that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the heads up. You have some great posts about the car at your blog. The 900 horsepower number sounds like it could be enough to push the car over the Bugatti record. My only concern is that Koenigseggs aren&#8217;t really hallmarks of reliability and I wonder what the latest changes do to address that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Naylor</title>
		<link>http://blog.hishamrana.com/2006/02/22/2006-koenigsegg-ccx/comment-page-1#comment-222</link>
		<dc:creator>David Naylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2006 10:26:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.hishamrana.com/2006/02/22/2006-koenigsegg-ccx/#comment-222</guid>
		<description>Hi!

Seems our blogs cover pretty much the same topics... Cool cars and Firefox.

Anyway, the CCX is apparently getting 900 BHP. See my blog entry here:

http://davidnaylor.org/blog/2006/02/koenigsegg-ccx-gets-900-bhp.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi!</p>
<p>Seems our blogs cover pretty much the same topics&#8230; Cool cars and Firefox.</p>
<p>Anyway, the CCX is apparently getting 900 BHP. See my blog entry here:</p>
<p><a href="http://davidnaylor.org/blog/2006/02/koenigsegg-ccx-gets-900-bhp.html" rel="nofollow">http://davidnaylor.org/blog/2006/02/koenigsegg-ccx-gets-900-bhp.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
